We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
If we can but prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy.
Tonight I saw the movie “Love Crime” and I liked it.
If you did not see the movie you can read about it HERE.
As I mentioned in several posts I always liked and admired smart strong women. If they were also beautiful it was fine but it was not really that important
On the way home heavy rain started and I came home in wet condition (I hope very much that you’ll forgive me this expression).
I took a hot shower, drank a hot tea and thought a bit about the movie.
Then I remembered the article by Hanna Rosin “Men are obsolete” that I already discussed in the post “A look from a different angle (part 2).”
The two women in the movie “Love Crime” are smart, strong and beautiful. They are top executives in a large company. Should we admire them? Is it a good prove that men are obsolete? Is it good for modern society that women who reach top positions behave the way these two women behave in the movie? Is it a victory of feminism?
I read many times in different blogs statement: “I am a feminist”.
Could anyone be so kind to explain to me what this statement means in America and other countries of the West today?
Please let me know.